The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, c(x), c(y)) → f(y, y, f(y, x, y))
f(s(x), y, z) → f(x, s(c(y)), c(z))
f(c(x), x, y) → c(y)
g(x, y) → x
g(x, y) → y

Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(1) CpxTrsToCpxRelTrsProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)

Transformed TRS to relative TRS where S is empty.

(2) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity Relative TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(x, c(x), c(y)) → f(y, y, f(y, x, y))
f(s(x), y, z) → f(x, s(c(y)), c(z))
f(c(x), x, y) → c(y)
g(x, y) → x
g(x, y) → y

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(3) DecreasingLoopProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Ω(n¹):
The rewrite sequence
f(s(x), y, z) →⁺ f(x, s(c(y)), c(z))
gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [].
The pumping substitution is [x / s(x)].
The result substitution is [y / s(c(y)), z / c(z)].

(4) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)